Core i3-4110M
VS
Core i5-760

Core i3-4110M vs Core i5-760

Intel

Core i3-4110M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i5-760

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.33 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-4110M is positioned at rank 101 and the Core i5-760 is on rank 973, so the Core i3-4110M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4110M

#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
94%
#89
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
274%
#90
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
270%
#91
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
248%
#92
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
247%
#93
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
244%
#95
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
236%
#96
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
226%
#97
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
226%
#98
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
220%
#101
Core i3-4110M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#102
N100
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
100%
#106
Ryzen 5 2500U
MSRP: $349|Avg: N/A
98%
#109
Celeron 4305U
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
97%
#110
Celeron J1850
MSRP: $82|Avg: N/A
97%
#114
Core i3-4100M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $99
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-760

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
26872%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
25391%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
18436%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5554%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4399%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3849%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2204%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2176%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1981%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1981%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1959%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1906%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1879%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1871%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1854%
#973
Core i5-760
MSRP: $230|Avg: $61
100%
#974
Core i3-7102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $80
100%
#975
Core 2 Quad Q8400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $128
98%
#976
Pentium E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
96%
#977
Pentium Dual-Core E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
96%
#978
Pentium Dual-Core E2140
MSRP: $74|Avg: $5
95%
#979
Core i7-960
MSRP: $309|Avg: $110
95%
#980
E1-1500
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
95%
#981
Core i5-2405S
MSRP: $309|Avg: $120
95%
#982
Celeron 420
MSRP: $39|Avg: $15
94%
#983
Athlon II X4 615e
MSRP: $186|Avg: $30
94%
#984
Athlon X2 BE-2350
MSRP: $90|Avg: $10
93%
#985
Core 2 Quad Q8300
MSRP: $179|Avg: $10
92%
#986
Core i7-860
MSRP: $284|Avg: $30
91%
#987
Core i7-870
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
91%
#988
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
MSRP: $136|Avg: $42
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-760 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-4110M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-4110MCore i5-760
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($61)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-4110MCore i5-760
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($61)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-4110M and Core i5-760

Intel

Core i3-4110M

The Core i3-4110M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,678 points. Launch price was $225.

Intel

Core i5-760

The Core i5-760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 July 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,667 points. Launch price was $230.

Processing Power

The Core i3-4110M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-760 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-760 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core i3-4110M versus 3.33 GHz on the Core i5-760 — a 24.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-760 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i3-4110M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-760 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4110M scores 2,678 against the Core i5-760's 2,667 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-4110M. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-4110M vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-760.

FeatureCore i3-4110MCore i5-760
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
3.33 GHz+28%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
2.8 GHz+8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8 MB (total)+167%
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark
2,678
2,667
Geekbench 6 Single
470
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4110M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-760 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1600 memory speed. The Core i3-4110M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore i3-4110MCore i5-760
Socket
PGA946
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+100%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4110M) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-760). The Core i3-4110M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i5-760 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4110M targets Mobile, Core i5-760 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-760 rivals Phenom II X4 970.

FeatureCore i3-4110MCore i5-760
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mobile
Legacy Desktop