Celeron J4115 vs Core i3-4110M

The Celeron J4115 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4110M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J4115 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4115 versus 2.6 GHz on the Core i3-4110M — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Core i3-4110M (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron J4115 uses the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-4110M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4115 scores 2,688 against the Core i3-4110M's 2,678 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron J4115. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron J4115 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-4110M.

The Celeron J4115 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4110M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2400 on the Celeron J4115 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-4110M — the Celeron J4115 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-4110M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron J4115) vs 16 (Core i3-4110M) — the Core i3-4110M offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron J4115) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4110M). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 600 (Celeron J4115) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4110M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4110M targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron J4115 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.