Celeron J4115 vs Core i5-5300U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J4115 vs Core i5-5300U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J4115 vs Core i5-5300U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J4115

2019

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 4W instead of 512W, a 508W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 600, while Core i5-5300U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-5300U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,688 vs 2,709).

Core i5-5300U

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌12700% higher power demand at 512W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J4115 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-5300U better than Celeron J4115?

Yes. Core i5-5300U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-5300U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-5300U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-5300U still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-5300U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J4115 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J4115 vs Core i5-5300U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J4115

The Celeron J4115 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,688 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-5300U

The Core i5-5300U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,709 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J4115 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-5300U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J4115 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4115 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-5300U — a 14.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-5300U (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Celeron J4115 uses the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-5300U uses Broadwell-U (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4115 scores 2,688 against the Core i5-5300U's 2,709 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-5300U. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron J4115 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-5300U.

Feature	Celeron J4115	Core i5-5300U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	2.9 GHz+16%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.3 GHz+28%
L3 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB	256K (per core)+6300%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Gemini Lake (2019)	Broadwell-U (2015)
PassMark	2,688	2,709

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4115 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-5300U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J4115	Core i5-5300U
Socket	FCBGA1090	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron J4115) / not specified (Core i5-5300U). The Celeron J4115 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Core i5-5300U requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4115 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.