Celeron J4115 vs Core i7-4600U

Intel

Celeron J4115

4 Cores4 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-4600U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Celeron J4115 vs Core i7-4600U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J4115 vs Core i7-4600U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J4115 vs Core i7-4600U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J4115

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 4W instead of 512W, a 508W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 600, while Core i7-4600U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,688 vs 2,720).

Core i7-4600U

2013

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • 12700% higher power demand at 512W vs 4W.
    • No integrated graphics, while Celeron J4115 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i7-4600U better than Celeron J4115?
    Yes. Core i7-4600U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4600U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4600U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i7-4600U still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-4600U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Celeron J4115 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Celeron J4115 vs Core i7-4600U Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Celeron J4115

    The Celeron J4115 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,688 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Core i7-4600U

    The Core i7-4600U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-ULT (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,720 points. Launch price was $398.

    Processing Power

    The Celeron J4115 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-4600U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J4115 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4115 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-4600U — a 27.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-4600U (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Celeron J4115 uses the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4600U uses Haswell-ULT (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4115 scores 2,688 against the Core i7-4600U's 2,720 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-4600U. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron J4115 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-4600U.

    FeatureCeleron J4115Core i7-4600U
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 4+100%
    2 / 4
    Boost Clock
    2.5 GHz
    3.3 GHz+32%
    Base Clock
    1.8 GHz
    2.1 GHz+17%
    L3 Cache
    4 MB
    4 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    4 MB
    256K (per core)+6300%
    Process
    14 nm-36%
    22 nm
    Architecture
    Gemini Lake (2019)
    Haswell-ULT (2013)
    PassMark
    2,688
    2,720+1%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Celeron J4115 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4600U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCeleron J4115Core i7-4600U
    Socket
    FCBGA1090
    FCBGA1168
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    2400
    Max RAM Capacity
    8
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    6
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: true (Celeron J4115) / not specified (Core i7-4600U). The Celeron J4115 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Core i7-4600U requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4115 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.

    FeatureCeleron J4115Core i7-4600U
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Intel UHD Graphics 600
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    true