Celeron J4115 vs Opteron 3350 HE

Celeron J4115 vs Opteron 3350 HE Performance Spectrum

Celeron J4115

4 / 4

2,688

0.0%

2,699

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J4115 vs Opteron 3350 HE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J4115 vs Opteron 3350 HE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J4115

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 45W, a 41W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 600, while Opteron 3350 HE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,688 vs 2,699).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

Opteron 3350 HE

2012

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌1025% higher power demand at 45W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J4115 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 3350 HE better than Celeron J4115?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 3350 HE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron J4115 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 3350 HE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 3350 HE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 3350 HE still makes the most sense overall. Opteron 3350 HE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J4115 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J4115 vs Opteron 3350 HE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J4115

The Celeron J4115 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,688 points. Launch price was $69.

Opteron 3350 HE

The Opteron 3350 HE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,699 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron J4115 and Opteron 3350 HE share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4115 versus 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 3350 HE — a 41.3% clock advantage for the Opteron 3350 HE (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron J4115 uses the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 3350 HE uses Delhi (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4115 scores 2,688 against the Opteron 3350 HE's 2,699 — a 0.4% lead for the Opteron 3350 HE. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron J4115 vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 3350 HE.

Feature	Celeron J4115	Opteron 3350 HE
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	3.8 GHz+52%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.8 GHz+56%
L3 Cache	4 MB	8192 kB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB	4096 kB
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Gemini Lake (2019)	Delhi (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,688	2,699

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4115 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 3350 HE uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J4115	Opteron 3350 HE
Socket	FCBGA1090	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron J4115) / not specified (Opteron 3350 HE). The Celeron J4115 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Opteron 3350 HE requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4115 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.