Celeron G4950 vs Celeron J4115

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4950 vs Celeron J4115 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4950 vs Celeron J4115: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4950

2019

Why buy it

✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $52 MSRP, while Celeron J4115 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1250% higher power demand at 54W vs 4W.

Celeron J4115

2019

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 4W instead of 54W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,688 vs 2,714).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4950 better than Celeron J4115?

Yes. Celeron G4950 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G4950 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G4950 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4950 is the better buy right now. Celeron G4950 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $52 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (52.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J4115 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G4950 vs Celeron J4115 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4950

The Celeron G4950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,714 points. Launch price was $52.

Celeron J4115

The Celeron J4115 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,688 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G4950 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron J4115 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J4115 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Celeron G4950 versus 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4115 — a 27.6% clock advantage for the Celeron G4950 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Celeron G4950 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron J4115 uses Gemini Lake (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4950 scores 2,714 against the Celeron J4115's 2,688 — a 1% lead for the Celeron G4950. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G4950 vs 4 MB on the Celeron J4115.

Feature	Celeron G4950	Celeron J4115
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+32%	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+83%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB	4 MB+700%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Gemini Lake (2019)
PassMark	2,714	2,688
Geekbench 6 Single	672	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,229	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4950 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron J4115 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. The Celeron G4950 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G4950) vs 6 (Celeron J4115) — the Celeron G4950 offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4950) and BGA1090 (Celeron J4115).

Feature	Celeron G4950	Celeron J4115
Socket	LGA1151	FCBGA1090
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	2400
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+700%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16+167%	6

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G4950) vs true (Celeron J4115). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4950) and Intel UHD Graphics 600 (Celeron J4115) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4950 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4950 rivals Pentium G5420; Celeron J4115 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.