Celeron J4115 vs PRO A12-9800B

Celeron J4115 vs PRO A12-9800B Performance Spectrum

Celeron J4115

4 / 4

2,688

0.0%

2,705

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J4115 vs PRO A12-9800B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J4115 vs PRO A12-9800B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J4115

2019

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 600, while PRO A12-9800B needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A12-9800B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,688 vs 2,705).
❌100% higher power demand at 4W vs 2W.

PRO A12-9800B

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 4W, a 2W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J4115 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A12-9800B better than Celeron J4115?

Yes. PRO A12-9800B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, PRO A12-9800B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, PRO A12-9800B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A12-9800B still makes the most sense overall. PRO A12-9800B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J4115 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J4115 vs PRO A12-9800B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J4115

The Celeron J4115 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,688 points. Launch price was $69.

PRO A12-9800B

The PRO A12-9800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,705 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron J4115 and PRO A12-9800B share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4115 versus 3.6 GHz on the PRO A12-9800B — a 36.1% clock advantage for the PRO A12-9800B (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Celeron J4115 uses the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the PRO A12-9800B uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4115 scores 2,688 against the PRO A12-9800B's 2,705 — a 0.6% lead for the PRO A12-9800B.

Feature	Celeron J4115	PRO A12-9800B
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	3.6 GHz+44%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.7 GHz+50%
L3 Cache	4 MB	—
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2048 kB
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Gemini Lake (2019)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,688	2,705

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4115 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A12-9800B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J4115	PRO A12-9800B
Socket	FCBGA1090	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron J4115) / not specified (PRO A12-9800B). The Celeron J4115 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the PRO A12-9800B requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4115 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.