Celeron J4115 vs Core m3-7Y32

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J4115 vs Core m3-7Y32 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J4115 vs Core m3-7Y32: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J4115

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 5W, a 1W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 600, while Core m3-7Y32 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,688 vs 2,697).

Core m3-7Y32

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Celeron J4115 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J4115 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core m3-7Y32 better than Celeron J4115?

Yes. Core m3-7Y32 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core m3-7Y32 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core m3-7Y32 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core m3-7Y32 is the better buy right now. Core m3-7Y32 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $281 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J4115 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J4115 vs Core m3-7Y32 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J4115

The Celeron J4115 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,688 points. Launch price was $69.

Core m3-7Y32

The Core m3-7Y32 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,697 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J4115 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core m3-7Y32 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J4115 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4115 versus 3 GHz on the Core m3-7Y32 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core m3-7Y32 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Celeron J4115 uses the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core m3-7Y32 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4115 scores 2,688 against the Core m3-7Y32's 2,697 — a 0.3% lead for the Core m3-7Y32. Both processors carry 4 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron J4115	Core m3-7Y32
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	3 GHz+20%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz+64%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	4 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	512 kB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Gemini Lake (2019)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,688	2,697

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4115 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m3-7Y32 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J4115	Core m3-7Y32
Socket	FCBGA1090	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron J4115) / not specified (Core m3-7Y32). The Celeron J4115 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Core m3-7Y32 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4115 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.