Celeron J4115 vs Core i5-3340M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J4115 vs Core i5-3340M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J4115 vs Core i5-3340M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J4115

2019

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 4W instead of 512W, a 508W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,688 vs 2,692).

Core i5-3340M

2013

Why buy it

✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌12700% higher power demand at 512W vs 4W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-3340M better than Celeron J4115?

Yes. Core i5-3340M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-3340M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3340M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-3340M still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-3340M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J4115 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J4115 vs Core i5-3340M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J4115

The Celeron J4115 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,688 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-3340M

The Core i5-3340M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,692 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J4115 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3340M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J4115 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4115 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-3340M — a 30.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-3340M (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Celeron J4115 uses the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-3340M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4115 scores 2,688 against the Core i5-3340M's 2,692 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-3340M. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron J4115 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3340M.

Feature	Celeron J4115	Core i5-3340M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	3.4 GHz+36%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.7 GHz+50%
L3 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB	256K (per core)+6300%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Gemini Lake (2019)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,688	2,692

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4115 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3340M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2400 on the Celeron J4115 versus DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 on the Core i5-3340M — the Celeron J4115 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-3340M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron J4115) vs 16 (Core i5-3340M) — the Core i5-3340M offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA1090 (Celeron J4115) and HM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i5-3340M).

Feature	Celeron J4115	Core i5-3340M
Socket	FCBGA1090	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2400+80%	DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	6	16+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron J4115) vs VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i5-3340M). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 600 (Celeron J4115) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3340M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3340M targets Professional Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron J4115 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G; Core i5-3340M rivals AMD A10-4600M.

Feature	Celeron J4115	Core i5-3340M
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 600	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x / VT-d / EPT
Target Use	—	Professional Laptop