Core i3-4110M vs Core i5-5300U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4110M vs Core i5-5300U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4110M vs Core i5-5300U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4110M

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core i5-5300U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-5300U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,678 vs 2,709).

Core i5-5300U

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4110M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-5300U better than Core i3-4110M?

Yes. Core i5-5300U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-5300U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-5300U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-5300U still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-5300U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-5300U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4110M vs Core i5-5300U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4110M

The Core i3-4110M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,678 points. Launch price was $225.

Core i5-5300U

The Core i5-5300U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,709 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-4110M and Core i5-5300U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core i3-4110M versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-5300U — a 10.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-5300U (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i3-4110M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-5300U uses Broadwell-U (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4110M scores 2,678 against the Core i5-5300U's 2,709 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-5300U. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-4110M vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-5300U.

Feature	Core i3-4110M	Core i5-5300U
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	2.9 GHz+12%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+13%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Broadwell-U (2015)
PassMark	2,678	2,709+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4110M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-5300U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-4110M	Core i5-5300U
Socket	PGA946	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4110M) / not specified (Core i5-5300U). The Core i3-4110M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i5-5300U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4110M targets Mobile.