A6-7310 vs Core i3-4110M

A6-7310 vs Core i3-4110M Performance Spectrum

A6-7310

4 / 4

2,689

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4110M

2 / 4

2,678

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-7310 vs Core i3-4110M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-7310 vs Core i3-4110M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-7310

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-4110M

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A6-7310 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,678 vs 2,689).
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-7310 better than Core i3-4110M?

Yes. A6-7310 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-7310 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-7310 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-7310 still makes the most sense overall. A6-7310 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-7310 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-7310 vs Core i3-4110M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-7310

The A6-7310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,689 points. Launch price was $70.

Core i3-4110M

The Core i3-4110M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,678 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-7310 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4110M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A6-7310 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-7310 versus 2.6 GHz on the Core i3-4110M — a 8% clock advantage for the Core i3-4110M (base: 2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The A6-7310 uses the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-4110M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7310 scores 2,689 against the Core i3-4110M's 2,678 — a 0.4% lead for the A6-7310.

Feature	A6-7310	Core i3-4110M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	2.6 GHz+8%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.6 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	—	3 MB
L2 Cache	2048 kB+300%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Carrizo-L (2015)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,689	2,678

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7310 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4110M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 1600 memory speed. The Core i3-4110M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-7310) vs 2 (Core i3-4110M). Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	A6-7310	Core i3-4110M
Socket	FP4	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A6-7310) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4110M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R4 Graphics (A6-7310) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4110M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4110M targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A6-7310 rivals Pentium N3700.