A6-7310 vs Core m3-7Y32

A6-7310 vs Core m3-7Y32 Performance Spectrum

A6-7310

4 / 4

2,689

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core m3-7Y32

2 / 4

2,697

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-7310 vs Core m3-7Y32 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-7310 vs Core m3-7Y32: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-7310

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 5W, a 3W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R4 Graphics, while Core m3-7Y32 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,689 vs 2,697).

Core m3-7Y32

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A6-7310 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while A6-7310 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌125% higher power demand at 4.5W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-7310 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core m3-7Y32 better than A6-7310?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-7310 is ahead with a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core m3-7Y32 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core m3-7Y32 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core m3-7Y32 is the better buy right now. Core m3-7Y32 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $281 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that A6-7310 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core m3-7Y32 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-7310 vs Core m3-7Y32 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-7310

The A6-7310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,689 points. Launch price was $70.

Core m3-7Y32

The Core m3-7Y32 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,697 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-7310 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core m3-7Y32 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A6-7310 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-7310 versus 3 GHz on the Core m3-7Y32 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core m3-7Y32 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A6-7310 uses the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core m3-7Y32 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7310 scores 2,689 against the Core m3-7Y32's 2,697 — a 0.3% lead for the Core m3-7Y32.

Feature	A6-7310	Core m3-7Y32
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	3 GHz+25%
Base Clock	2 GHz+82%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB
L2 Cache	2048 kB+300%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Carrizo-L (2015)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,689	2,697

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7310 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m3-7Y32 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A6-7310	Core m3-7Y32
Socket	FP4	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A6-7310) / not specified (Core m3-7Y32). The A6-7310 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R4 Graphics), while the Core m3-7Y32 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A6-7310 rivals Pentium N3700.