A6-7310 vs Celeron G4950

A6-7310 vs Celeron G4950 Performance Spectrum

A6-7310

4 / 4

2,689

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G4950

2 / 2

2,714

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-7310 vs Celeron G4950 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-7310 vs Celeron G4950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-7310

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 54W, a 52W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,689 vs 2,714).

Celeron G4950

2019

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $52 MSRP, while A6-7310 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2600% higher power demand at 54W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4950 better than A6-7310?

Yes. Celeron G4950 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G4950 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G4950 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4950 is the better buy right now. Celeron G4950 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $52 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (52.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4950 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-7310 vs Celeron G4950 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-7310

The A6-7310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,689 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron G4950

The Celeron G4950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,714 points. Launch price was $52.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-7310 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G4950 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6-7310 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-7310 versus 3.3 GHz on the Celeron G4950 — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Celeron G4950 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The A6-7310 uses the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron G4950 uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7310 scores 2,689 against the Celeron G4950's 2,714 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron G4950.

Feature	A6-7310	Celeron G4950
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	3.3 GHz+38%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.3 GHz+65%
L3 Cache	—	2 MB
L2 Cache	2048 kB+300%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Carrizo-L (2015)	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark	2,689	2,714
Geekbench 6 Single	—	672
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,229

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7310 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G4950 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A6-7310 versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4950 — the Celeron G4950 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4950 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-7310) vs 2 (Celeron G4950). Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FT3b,FP4 (A6-7310) and H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4950).

Feature	A6-7310	Celeron G4950
Socket	FP4	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	DDR4-2400+50%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	64 GB+300%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A6-7310) vs VT-x (Celeron G4950). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R4 Graphics (A6-7310) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4950) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4950 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A6-7310 rivals Pentium N3700; Celeron G4950 rivals Pentium G5420.