A6-7310 vs Core i5-3340M

A6-7310 vs Core i5-3340M Performance Spectrum

A6-7310

4 / 4

2,689

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-3340M

2 / 4

2,692

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-7310 vs Core i5-3340M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-7310 vs Core i5-3340M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-7310

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,689 vs 2,692).

Core i5-3340M

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-3340M better than A6-7310?

Yes. Core i5-3340M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-3340M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3340M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-3340M still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-3340M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-7310 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-7310 vs Core i5-3340M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-7310

The A6-7310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,689 points. Launch price was $70.

Core i5-3340M

The Core i5-3340M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,692 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-7310 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3340M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A6-7310 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-7310 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-3340M — a 34.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-3340M (base: 2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The A6-7310 uses the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-3340M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7310 scores 2,689 against the Core i5-3340M's 2,692 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-3340M.

Feature	A6-7310	Core i5-3340M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	3.4 GHz+42%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.7 GHz+35%
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Carrizo-L (2015)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,689	2,692

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7310 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3340M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A6-7310 versus DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 on the Core i5-3340M — the A6-7310 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-3340M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-7310) vs 2 (Core i5-3340M). Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FT3b,FP4 (A6-7310) and HM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i5-3340M).

Feature	A6-7310	Core i5-3340M
Socket	FP4	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600+20%	DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A6-7310) vs VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i5-3340M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R4 Graphics (A6-7310) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3340M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3340M targets Professional Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-7310 rivals Pentium N3700; Core i5-3340M rivals AMD A10-4600M.

Feature	A6-7310	Core i5-3340M
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon R4 Graphics	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x / VT-d / EPT
Target Use	—	Professional Laptop