PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-760 vs Core i5-4288U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-760 vs Core i5-4288U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-760

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Costs $112 less on MSRP ($230 MSRP vs $342 MSRP).
✅Delivers 49.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.6 vs 7.8 PassMark/$ ($230 MSRP vs $342 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (470 vs 880).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4288U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-4288U

2013

Why buy it

✅+87.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Iris Graphics 5100, while Core i5-760 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,659 vs 2,667).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.8 vs 11.6 PassMark/$ ($342 MSRP vs $230 MSRP).
❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-760.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-760 better than Core i5-4288U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-4288U is ahead with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-760 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Core i5-760 also has the bigger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-760 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-760 is the better buy right now. Core i5-760 comes in $112 cheaper on MSRP at $230 MSRP versus $342 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-4288U is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 49.1% better value on MSRP (11.6 vs 7.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4288U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-760 vs Core i5-4288U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-760

The Core i5-760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 July 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,667 points. Launch price was $230.

Core i5-4288U

The Core i5-4288U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,659 points. Launch price was $342.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-760 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4288U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-760 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.33 GHz on the Core i5-760 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-4288U — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-760 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-760 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-4288U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-760 scores 2,667 against the Core i5-4288U's 2,659 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-760. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 470 vs 880, a 60.7% lead for the Core i5-4288U that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-760 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-4288U.

Feature	Core i5-760	Core i5-4288U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.33 GHz+7%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+8%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+167%	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	45 nm	22 nm-51%
Architecture	Lynnfield (2009−2010)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,667	2,659
Geekbench 6 Single	470	880+87%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,800

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-760 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-4288U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-760 versus DDR3L 1600 MHz on the Core i5-4288U — the Core i5-4288U supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-760) vs 12 (Core i5-4288U) — the Core i5-760 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: P55,H55,H57,Q57 (Core i5-760) and Intel HM86,Intel HM87,Intel QM87 (Core i5-4288U).

Feature	Core i5-760	Core i5-4288U
Socket	LGA1156	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3L 1600 MHz+20%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-760) vs true (Core i5-4288U). The Core i5-4288U includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Graphics 5100), while the Core i5-760 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-760 targets Legacy Desktop, Core i5-4288U targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-760 rivals Phenom II X4 970.

Feature	Core i5-760	Core i5-4288U
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	None	Intel Iris Graphics 5100
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	true
Target Use	Legacy Desktop	Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-760 was priced at $230, while the Core i5-4288U came in at $342. On launch pricing ($230 vs $342), Core i5-760 was $112 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-760 delivers 11.6 pts/$ vs 7.8 pts/$ for the Core i5-4288U — making the Core i5-760 the 39.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-760	Core i5-4288U
MSRP	$230-33%	$342
Performance per Dollar	11.6+49%	7.8
Release Date	2010	2013

Search Core i5-760 on Amazon

Search Core i5-4288U on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.