Core i5-760 vs Xeon E5-2403 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-760 vs Xeon E5-2403 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-760 vs Xeon E5-2403 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-760

2010

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2403 v2.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2403 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,667 vs 2,672).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2403 v2, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads and 24 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.6 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($230 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).

Xeon E5-2403 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads, plus 24 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Costs $38 less on MSRP ($192 MSRP vs $230 MSRP).
✅Delivers 20.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 11.6 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $230 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-760.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2403 v2 better than Core i5-760?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2403 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-760 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2403 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2403 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2403 v2 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2403 v2 comes in $38 cheaper on MSRP at $192 MSRP versus $230 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 20.0% better value on MSRP (13.9 vs 11.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2403 v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010), 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-760 vs Xeon E5-2403 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-760

The Core i5-760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 July 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,667 points. Launch price was $230.

Xeon E5-2403 v2

The Xeon E5-2403 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,672 points. Launch price was $223.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-760 and Xeon E5-2403 v2 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.33 GHz on the Core i5-760 versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2403 v2 — a 59.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-760 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i5-760 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon E5-2403 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-760 scores 2,667 against the Xeon E5-2403 v2's 2,672 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2403 v2. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-760 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2403 v2.

Feature	Core i5-760	Xeon E5-2403 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.33 GHz+85%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+56%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	10 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	22 nm-51%
Architecture	Lynnfield (2009−2010)	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
PassMark	2,667	2,672
Geekbench 6 Single	470	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-760 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2403 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Xeon E5-2403 v2 supports up to 384 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 2300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-760) vs 3 (Xeon E5-2403 v2). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-760) vs 24 (Xeon E5-2403 v2) — the Xeon E5-2403 v2 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i5-760	Xeon E5-2403 v2
Socket	LGA1156	LGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	384 GB+2300%
RAM Channels	2	3+50%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	24+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-760) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2403 v2). Primary use case: Core i5-760 targets Legacy Desktop, Xeon E5-2403 v2 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i5-760 rivals Phenom II X4 970.

Feature	Core i5-760	Xeon E5-2403 v2
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Legacy Desktop	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-760 was priced at $230, while the Xeon E5-2403 v2 came in at $192. On launch pricing ($230 vs $192), Xeon E5-2403 v2 was $38 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-760 delivers 11.6 pts/$ vs 13.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2403 v2 — making the Xeon E5-2403 v2 the 18.2% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-760	Xeon E5-2403 v2
MSRP	$230	$192-17%
Performance per Dollar	11.6	13.9+20%
Release Date	2010	2013

Search Core i5-760 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2403 v2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.