Celeron J4115 vs Core i5-760

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J4115 vs Core i5-760 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J4115 vs Core i5-760: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J4115

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 4W instead of 95W, a 91W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 600, while Core i5-760 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-760.

Core i5-760

2010

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron J4115.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,667 vs 2,688).
❌Launch MSRP is still $230 MSRP, while Celeron J4115 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2275% higher power demand at 95W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J4115 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J4115 better than Core i5-760?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-760 is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J4115 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Core i5-760 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J4115 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J4115 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron J4115 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $230 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. Core i5-760 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (11.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1156.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J4115 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron J4115 vs Core i5-760 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J4115

The Celeron J4115 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,688 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-760

The Core i5-760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 July 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,667 points. Launch price was $230.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron J4115 and Core i5-760 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4115 versus 3.33 GHz on the Core i5-760 — a 28.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-760 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron J4115 uses the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-760 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4115 scores 2,688 against the Core i5-760's 2,667 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron J4115. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron J4115 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-760.

Feature	Celeron J4115	Core i5-760
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	3.33 GHz+33%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.8 GHz+56%
L3 Cache	4 MB	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Gemini Lake (2019)	Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark	2,688	2,667
Geekbench 6 Single	—	470

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4115 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-760 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2400 on the Celeron J4115 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-760 — the Celeron J4115 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-760 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron J4115) vs 16 (Core i5-760) — the Core i5-760 offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA1090 (Celeron J4115) and P55,H55,H57,Q57 (Core i5-760).

Feature	Celeron J4115	Core i5-760
Socket	FCBGA1090	LGA1156
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	2400+80%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	6	16+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron J4115) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-760). The Celeron J4115 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Core i5-760 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-760 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron J4115 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G; Core i5-760 rivals Phenom II X4 970.