A6-7310 vs Core i5-760

A6-7310 vs Core i5-760 Performance Spectrum

A6-7310

4 / 4

2,689

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-760

4 / 4

2,667

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-7310 vs Core i5-760 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-7310 vs Core i5-760: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-7310

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 95W, a 93W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R4 Graphics, while Core i5-760 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-760.

Core i5-760

2010

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike A6-7310.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,667 vs 2,689).
❌Launch MSRP is still $230 MSRP, while A6-7310 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌4650% higher power demand at 95W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-7310 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-7310 better than Core i5-760?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-760 is ahead with a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A6-7310 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-7310 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-7310 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A6-7310 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $230 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. Core i5-760 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (11.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1156.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-7310 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-7310 vs Core i5-760 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-7310

The A6-7310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,689 points. Launch price was $70.

Core i5-760

The Core i5-760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 July 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,667 points. Launch price was $230.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-7310 and Core i5-760 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-7310 versus 3.33 GHz on the Core i5-760 — a 32.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-760 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A6-7310 uses the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-760 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7310 scores 2,689 against the Core i5-760's 2,667 — a 0.8% lead for the A6-7310.

Feature	A6-7310	Core i5-760
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	3.33 GHz+39%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.8 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	—	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Carrizo-L (2015)	Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark	2,689	2,667
Geekbench 6 Single	—	470

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7310 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-760 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A6-7310 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-760 — the A6-7310 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A6-7310) vs 2 (Core i5-760). Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FT3b,FP4 (A6-7310) and P55,H55,H57,Q57 (Core i5-760).

Feature	A6-7310	Core i5-760
Socket	FP4	LGA1156
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A6-7310) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-760). The A6-7310 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R4 Graphics), while the Core i5-760 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-760 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: A6-7310 rivals Pentium N3700; Core i5-760 rivals Phenom II X4 970.