
Core i5-3320M

Core i7-4510U
Core i5-3320M vs Core i7-4510U Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-3320M vs Core i7-4510U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-3320M vs Core i7-4510U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-3320M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $168 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 76.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 6.7 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
Core i7-4510U
2014Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-3320M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,634 vs 2,660).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($393 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-3320M better than Core i7-4510U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-3320M vs Core i7-4510U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3320M
The Core i5-3320M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,660 points. Launch price was $225.

Core i7-4510U
The Core i7-4510U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,634 points. Launch price was $393.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-3320M and Core i7-4510U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-3320M versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-4510U — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-3320M (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-3320M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-4510U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3320M scores 2,660 against the Core i7-4510U's 2,634 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-3320M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3320M vs 4 MB on the Core i7-4510U.
| Feature | Core i5-3320M | Core i7-4510U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz+6% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+30% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 4 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB+100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 2,660 | 2,634 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 880 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-3320M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4510U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 1600 memory speed. The Core i5-3320M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-3320M) vs 12 (Core i7-4510U) — the Core i5-3320M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM75,HM76,HM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i5-3320M) and SoC (Core i7-4510U).
| Feature | Core i5-3320M | Core i7-4510U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | FCBGA1168 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600 | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+33% | 12 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i5-3320M) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i7-4510U). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3320M) and HD Graphics 4400 (Core i7-4510U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4510U targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i5-3320M rivals AMD A10-4600M; Core i7-4510U rivals A10-7300.
| Feature | Core i5-3320M | Core i7-4510U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | HD Graphics 4400 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Ultrabook |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-3320M was priced at $225, while the Core i7-4510U came in at $393. On launch pricing ($225 vs $393), Core i5-3320M was $168 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3320M delivers 11.8 pts/$ vs 6.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-4510U — making the Core i5-3320M the 55.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-3320M | Core i7-4510U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $225-43% | $393 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.8+76% | 6.7 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














