Core i5-3330 vs Xeon E5-1607 v2

Intel

Core i5-3330

4 Cores4 Thrd77 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-1607 v2

4 Cores4 Thrd130 WWMax: 3 GHz2013

Core i5-3330 vs Xeon E5-1607 v2 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-3330 vs Xeon E5-1607 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-3330 vs Xeon E5-1607 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-3330

2012

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $68 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 36.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.5 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 77W instead of 130W, a 53W reduction.
  • βœ…100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • βœ…Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 2500, while Xeon E5-1607 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1607 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (4,100 vs 4,141).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 10 MB).

Xeon E5-1607 v2

2013

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…+66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 22.5 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
  • ❌68.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 77W.
  • ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3330 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-3330.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-1607 v2 better than Core i5-3330?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1607 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-3330 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-1607 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1607 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E5-1607 v2 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon E5-1607 v2 comes in 37.4% more expensive on MSRP at $250 MSRP versus $182 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-3330 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 36.0% better value on paper (22.5 vs 16.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E5-1607 v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012), 66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-3330 vs Xeon E5-1607 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-3330

The Core i5-3330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012βˆ’2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,100 points. Launch price was $360.

Intel

Xeon E5-1607 v2

The Xeon E5-1607 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,141 points. Launch price was $800.

⚑

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-3330 and Xeon E5-1607 v2 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-3330 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-1607 v2 β€” a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-3330 (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-3330 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012βˆ’2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-E (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3330 scores 4,100 against the Xeon E5-1607 v2's 4,141 β€” a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-1607 v2. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-3330 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1607 v2.

FeatureCore i5-3330Xeon E5-1607 v2
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+7%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz
3 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
10 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012βˆ’2013)
Ivy Bridge-E (2013)
PassMark
4,100
4,141+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
600
β€”
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3330 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-3330Xeon E5-1607 v2
Socket
LGA1155
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
β€”
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
β€”
RAM Channels
2
β€”
ECC Support
No
β€”
PCIe Lanes
16
β€”
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-3330) / not specified (Xeon E5-1607 v2). The Core i5-3330 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2500), while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3330 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-3330 rivals FX-6300.

FeatureCore i5-3330Xeon E5-1607 v2
Integrated GPU
Yes
β€”
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 2500
β€”
Unlocked
No
β€”
AVX-512
No
β€”
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
β€”
Target Use
Legacy Desktop
β€”
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-3330 was priced at $182, while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 came in at $250. On launch pricing ($182 vs $250), Core i5-3330 was $68 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3330 delivers 22.5 pts/$ vs 16.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1607 v2 β€” making the Core i5-3330 the 30.5% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-3330Xeon E5-1607 v2
MSRP
$182-27%
$250
Performance per Dollar
22.5+36%
16.6
Release Date
2012
2013

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.