
Core i5-3330

Xeon E5-1607 v2
Core i5-3330 vs Xeon E5-1607 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-3330 vs Xeon E5-1607 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-3330 vs Xeon E5-1607 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-3330
2012Why buy it
- β Costs $68 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- β Delivers 36.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.5 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- β Draws 77W instead of 130W, a 53W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 2500, while Xeon E5-1607 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1607 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (4,100 vs 4,141).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 10 MB).
Xeon E5-1607 v2
2013Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 22.5 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
- β68.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 77W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-3330 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-3330.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-1607 v2 better than Core i5-3330?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-3330 vs Xeon E5-1607 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3330
The Core i5-3330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,100 points. Launch price was $360.

Xeon E5-1607 v2
The Xeon E5-1607 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,141 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-3330 and Xeon E5-1607 v2 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-3330 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-1607 v2 β a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-3330 (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-3330 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-E (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3330 scores 4,100 against the Xeon E5-1607 v2's 4,141 β a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-1607 v2. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-3330 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1607 v2.
| Feature | Core i5-3330 | Xeon E5-1607 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+7% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 10 MB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) | Ivy Bridge-E (2013) |
| PassMark | 4,100 | 4,141+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 600 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-3330 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-3330 | Xeon E5-1607 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-3330) / not specified (Xeon E5-1607 v2). The Core i5-3330 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2500), while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3330 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-3330 rivals FX-6300.
| Feature | Core i5-3330 | Xeon E5-1607 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 2500 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | β |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-3330 was priced at $182, while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 came in at $250. On launch pricing ($182 vs $250), Core i5-3330 was $68 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3330 delivers 22.5 pts/$ vs 16.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1607 v2 β making the Core i5-3330 the 30.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-3330 | Xeon E5-1607 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $182-27% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.5+36% | 16.6 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














