Core i5-3350P vs Opteron 4376 HE

Intel

Core i5-3350P

4 Cores4 Thrd69 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Opteron 4376 HE

8 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-3350P vs Opteron 4376 HE Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-3350P vs Opteron 4376 HE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-3350P vs Opteron 4376 HE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-3350P

2012

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 4376 HE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (4,314 vs 4,318).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
    • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 4376 HE, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads.
    • Launch MSRP is still $189 MSRP, while Opteron 4376 HE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

    Opteron 4376 HE

    2012

    Why buy it

    • Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
    • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads.
    • Draws 65W instead of 69W, a 4W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Opteron 4376 HE better than Core i5-3350P?
    Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 4376 HE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-3350P is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Opteron 4376 HE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 4376 HE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Opteron 4376 HE is still the much better call for a fresh build. Opteron 4376 HE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $189 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-3350P only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (22.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Opteron 4376 HE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Core i5-3350P vs Opteron 4376 HE Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core i5-3350P

    The Core i5-3350P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 69 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,314 points. Launch price was $292.

    AMD

    Opteron 4376 HE

    The Opteron 4376 HE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Seoul (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: C32. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,318 points. Launch price was $800.

    Processing Power

    The Core i5-3350P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 4376 HE offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 4376 HE has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-3350P versus 3.6 GHz on the Opteron 4376 HE — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Opteron 4376 HE (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-3350P uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 4376 HE uses Seoul (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3350P scores 4,314 against the Opteron 4376 HE's 4,318 — a 0.1% lead for the Opteron 4376 HE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-3350P vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 4376 HE.

    FeatureCore i5-3350POpteron 4376 HE
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 4
    8 / 8+100%
    Boost Clock
    3.3 GHz
    3.6 GHz+9%
    Base Clock
    3.1 GHz+19%
    2.6 GHz
    L3 Cache
    6 MB (total)
    8192 kB (total)+33%
    L2 Cache
    256 kB (per core)
    8192 kB+3100%
    Process
    22 nm-31%
    32 nm
    Architecture
    Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
    Seoul (2012)
    PassMark
    4,314
    4,318
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i5-3350P uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 4376 HE uses C32 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i5-3350POpteron 4376 HE
    Socket
    LGA1155
    C32
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0+50%
    PCIe 2.0