Core i5-3427U vs Core i5-8200Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-3427U vs Core i5-8200Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-3427U vs Core i5-8200Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-3427U

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌10140% higher power demand at 512W vs 5W.

Core i5-8200Y

2018

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 5W instead of 512W, a 507W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,245 vs 2,252).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-8200Y better than Core i5-3427U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-8200Y is ahead with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3427U pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Core i5-8200Y also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3427U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-8200Y still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-8200Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-8200Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2012) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-3427U vs Core i5-8200Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3427U

The Core i5-3427U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,252 points. Launch price was $225.

Core i5-8200Y

The Core i5-8200Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $291.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-3427U and Core i5-8200Y share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i5-3427U versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-8200Y — a 32.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-8200Y (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Core i5-3427U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-8200Y uses Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3427U scores 2,252 against the Core i5-8200Y's 2,245 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-3427U. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3427U vs 4 MB on the Core i5-8200Y.

Feature	Core i5-3427U	Core i5-8200Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	3.9 GHz+39%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz+38%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	4 MB+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)
PassMark	2,252	2,245
Geekbench 6 Single	—	858

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3427U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-8200Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Core i5-3427U versus LPDDR3-1866 on the Core i5-8200Y — the Core i5-8200Y supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-3427U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-3427U) vs 10 (Core i5-8200Y) — the Core i5-3427U offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM76,UM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i5-3427U) and Amber Lake-Y (Core i5-8200Y).

Feature	Core i5-3427U	Core i5-8200Y
Socket	BGA1023	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	LPDDR3-1866+17%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+60%	10

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i5-3427U) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8200Y). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3427U) and UHD Graphics 615 (Core i5-8200Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-8200Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: Core i5-3427U rivals AMD A8-4555M; Core i5-8200Y rivals Athlon 300U.

Feature	Core i5-3427U	Core i5-8200Y
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 4000	UHD Graphics 615
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Tablet/2-in-1