Celeron G3930
VS
Core i5-3427U

Celeron G3930 vs Core i5-3427U

Intel

Celeron G3930

2 Cores2 Thrd51 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i5-3427U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G3930 is positioned at rank 395 and the Core i5-3427U is on rank 979, so the Celeron G3930 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3930

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5795%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5476%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3976%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1198%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
949%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
830%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
475%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
469%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
427%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
427%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
422%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
411%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
405%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
404%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
400%
#226
Ryzen 5 1600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $144
97%
#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
98%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
98%
#336
Core i7-8700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $196
97%
#337
Ryzen 5 3600XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $357
97%
#395
Celeron G3930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $25
100%
#396
Ryzen 3 1300X
MSRP: $129|Avg: $54
100%
#400
Phenom II X3 710
MSRP: $125|Avg: N/A
99%
#402
A10-7700K
MSRP: $152|Avg: N/A
99%
#403
Celeron G3930TE
MSRP: $42|Avg: $29
98%
#410
Core i3-8100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $45
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3427U

#967
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1955%
#968
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1926%
#969
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1768%
#970
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1760%
#971
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1744%
#973
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1684%
#974
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1615%
#975
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1612%
#976
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1569%
#979
Core i5-3427U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#982
Athlon II Neo K125
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#986
Pro A8-8600B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
98%
#991
Pentium 8500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
97%
#992
A6-8500P
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16
96%
#994
Core i7-4700EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $180
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G3930 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron G3930Core i5-3427U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-3427U (2012) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron G3930Core i5-3427U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G3930 and Core i5-3427U

Intel

Celeron G3930

The Celeron G3930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,259 points. Launch price was $42.

Intel

Core i5-3427U

The Core i5-3427U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,252 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The Celeron G3930 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-3427U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3930 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i5-3427U — a 3.5% clock advantage for the Celeron G3930 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Celeron G3930 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-3427U uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930 scores 2,259 against the Core i5-3427U's 2,252 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron G3930. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3930 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3427U.

FeatureCeleron G3930Core i5-3427U
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz+4%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+61%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,259
2,252
Geekbench 6 Single
750
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,100
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3930 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3427U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3930 versus 1600 on the Core i5-3427U — the Core i5-3427U supports 199% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3930 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930) and HM76,UM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i5-3427U).

FeatureCeleron G3930Core i5-3427U
Socket
LGA1151
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
1600+39900%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+209715100%
32
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G3930) vs true (Core i5-3427U). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 610 (Celeron G3930) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3427U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930 rivals Pentium G4560; Core i5-3427U rivals AMD A8-4555M.

FeatureCeleron G3930Core i5-3427U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 610
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
true
Target Use
Budget