Celeron G3930
VS
Core i3-6006U

Celeron G3930 vs Core i3-6006U

Intel

Celeron G3930

2 Cores2 Thrd51 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i3-6006U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 2 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G3930 is positioned at rank 395 and the Core i3-6006U is on rank 370, so the Core i3-6006U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3930

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5795%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5476%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3976%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1198%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
949%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
830%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
475%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
469%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
427%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
427%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
422%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
411%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
405%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
404%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
400%
#226
Ryzen 5 1600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $144
97%
#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
98%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
98%
#336
Core i7-8700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $196
97%
#337
Ryzen 5 3600XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $357
97%
#395
Celeron G3930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $25
100%
#396
Ryzen 3 1300X
MSRP: $129|Avg: $54
100%
#400
Phenom II X3 710
MSRP: $125|Avg: N/A
99%
#402
A10-7700K
MSRP: $152|Avg: N/A
99%
#403
Celeron G3930TE
MSRP: $42|Avg: $29
98%
#410
Core i3-8100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $45
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-6006U

#358
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
516%
#359
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
509%
#360
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
467%
#361
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
465%
#362
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
461%
#364
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
445%
#365
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
427%
#366
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
426%
#367
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
414%
#370
Core i3-6006U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#375
Pentium Dual Core T3200
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G3930 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron G3930Core i3-6006U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-6006U (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron G3930Core i3-6006U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G3930 and Core i3-6006U

Intel

Celeron G3930

The Celeron G3930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,259 points. Launch price was $42.

Intel

Core i3-6006U

The Core i3-6006U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 November 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,273 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

The Celeron G3930 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-6006U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3930 versus 2 GHz on the Core i3-6006U — a 36.7% clock advantage for the Celeron G3930 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron G3930 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-6006U uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930 scores 2,259 against the Core i3-6006U's 2,273 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-6006U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 750 vs 630, a 17.4% lead for the Celeron G3930 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,100 vs 1,313 (17.7% advantage for the Core i3-6006U). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3930 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-6006U.

FeatureCeleron G3930Core i3-6006U
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz+45%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+45%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
3 MB+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
2,259
2,273
Cinebench R23 Multi
2,200
Geekbench 6 Single
750+19%
630
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,100
1,313+19%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3930 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-6006U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. The Celeron G3930 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G3930) vs 12 (Core i3-6006U) — the Celeron G3930 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930) and Skylake-U (Core i3-6006U).

FeatureCeleron G3930Core i3-6006U
Socket
LGA1151
BGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+100%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G3930) vs Yes (Core i3-6006U). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 610 (Celeron G3930) and HD Graphics 520 (Core i3-6006U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930 targets Budget, Core i3-6006U targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930 rivals Pentium G4560.

FeatureCeleron G3930Core i3-6006U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 520
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Yes
Target Use
Budget
Mobile