
Celeron G3930

Core i5-650
Celeron G3930 vs Core i5-650 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G3930 vs Core i5-650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G3930 vs Core i5-650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G3930
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $134 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $176 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 320.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.8 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $176 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 51W instead of 73W, a 22W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
Core i5-650
2010Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,254 vs 2,259).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 53.8 PassMark/$ ($176 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
- ❌43.1% higher power demand at 73W vs 51W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3930 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G3930 better than Core i5-650?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G3930 vs Core i5-650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930
The Celeron G3930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,259 points. Launch price was $42.

Core i5-650
The Core i5-650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,254 points. Launch price was $35.
Processing Power
The Celeron G3930 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-650's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3930 versus 3.46 GHz on the Core i5-650 — a 17.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-650 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Celeron G3930 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-650 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930 scores 2,259 against the Core i5-650's 2,254 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron G3930. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3930 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-650.
| Feature | Celeron G3930 | Core i5-650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.46 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.2 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 4 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Clarkdale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,259 | 2,254 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 750 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,100 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G3930 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-650 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G3930 | Core i5-650 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3930) / not specified (Core i5-650). The Celeron G3930 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Core i5-650 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930 rivals Pentium G4560.
| Feature | Celeron G3930 | Core i5-650 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G3930 was priced at $42, while the Core i5-650 came in at $176. On launch pricing ($42 vs $176), Celeron G3930 was $134 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3930 delivers 53.8 pts/$ vs 12.8 pts/$ for the Core i5-650 — making the Celeron G3930 the 123.1% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G3930 | Core i5-650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-76% | $176 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.8+320% | 12.8 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














