
Core i5-3470

Core i7-3612QM
Core i5-3470 vs Core i7-3612QM Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-3470 vs Core i7-3612QM FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-3470 vs Core i7-3612QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-3470
2012Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $194 less on MSRP ($184 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 105.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.3 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($184 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3612QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌120% higher power demand at 77W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-3612QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-3612QM
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 77W, a 42W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Core i5-3470 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,661 vs 4,663).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 25.3 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $184 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-3470 better than Core i7-3612QM?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-3470 vs Core i7-3612QM Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3470
The Core i5-3470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,663 points. Launch price was $184.

Core i7-3612QM
The Core i7-3612QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,661 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-3470 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-3612QM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-3470 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-3612QM — a 14.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-3470 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-3470 scores 4,663 against the Core i7-3612QM's 4,661 — a 0% lead for the Core i5-3470. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-3470 | Core i7-3612QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+16% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+52% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 4,663 | 4,661 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 600 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,600 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-3470 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3612QM uses FCBGA1224 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-3470 | Core i7-3612QM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | FCBGA1224 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-3470) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3612QM). The Core i7-3612QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Core i5-3470 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3612QM targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3612QM rivals AMD A10-5750M.
| Feature | Core i5-3470 | Core i7-3612QM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Mainstream Laptop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-3470 was priced at $184, while the Core i7-3612QM came in at $378. On launch pricing ($184 vs $378), Core i5-3470 was $194 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3470 delivers 25.3 pts/$ vs 12.3 pts/$ for the Core i7-3612QM — making the Core i5-3470 the 69.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-3470 | Core i7-3612QM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $184-51% | $378 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.3+106% | 12.3 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














