
Core i5-3470

Xeon L5640
Core i5-3470 vs Xeon L5640 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-3470 vs Xeon L5640 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-3470 vs Xeon L5640: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-3470
2012Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $812 less on MSRP ($184 MSRP vs $996 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 441.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.3 vs 4.7 PassMark/$ ($184 MSRP vs $996 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon L5640 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon L5640, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ❌28.3% higher power demand at 77W vs 60W.
Xeon L5640
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 77W, a 17W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,659 vs 4,663).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.7 vs 25.3 PassMark/$ ($996 MSRP vs $184 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-3470 better than Xeon L5640?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-3470 vs Xeon L5640 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3470
The Core i5-3470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,663 points. Launch price was $184.

Xeon L5640
The Xeon L5640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,659 points. Launch price was $200.
Processing Power
The Core i5-3470 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon L5640 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon L5640 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-3470 versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon L5640 — a 25% clock advantage for the Core i5-3470 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The Core i5-3470 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon L5640 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3470 scores 4,663 against the Xeon L5640's 4,659 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-3470. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-3470 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon L5640.
| Feature | Core i5-3470 | Xeon L5640 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+29% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+42% | 2.26 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 4,663 | 4,659 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-3470 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon L5640 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-3470 | Xeon L5640 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3 1333 MHz |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 288 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 3 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-3470) / true (Xeon L5640). Primary use case: Xeon L5640 targets Server Low Power.
| Feature | Core i5-3470 | Xeon L5640 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
| Target Use | — | Server Low Power |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-3470 was priced at $184, while the Xeon L5640 came in at $996. On launch pricing ($184 vs $996), Core i5-3470 was $812 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3470 delivers 25.3 pts/$ vs 4.7 pts/$ for the Xeon L5640 — making the Core i5-3470 the 137.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-3470 | Xeon L5640 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $184-82% | $996 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.3+438% | 4.7 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














