Core i5-3470T vs Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Core i5-3470T
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-3470T is positioned at rank 879 and the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 is on rank 880, so the Core i5-3470T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3470T
Performance Per Dollar Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-3470T | Celeron Dual-Core T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($35) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-3470T | Celeron Dual-Core T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+328%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($35) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-3470T and Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Core i5-3470T
The Core i5-3470T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,999 points. Launch price was $210.
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
The Celeron Dual-Core T1600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.66 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 3,000 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-3470T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron Dual-Core T1600's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-3470T versus 1.66 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 — a 73.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-3470T. The Core i5-3470T uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3470T scores 2,999 against the Celeron Dual-Core T1600's 3,000 — a 0% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T1600.
| Feature | Core i5-3470T | Celeron Dual-Core T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+117% | 1.66 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1 MB+300% |
| Process | 22 nm-66% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 2,999 | 3,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-3470T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-3470T | Celeron Dual-Core T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 4 |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-3470T) / false (Celeron Dual-Core T1600). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T1600 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1600 rivals Pentium T2390.
| Feature | Core i5-3470T | Celeron Dual-Core T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | false |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-3470T launched at $184 MSRP, while the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 debuted at $150. At current prices ($35 vs $150), the Core i5-3470T is $115 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3470T delivers 85.7 pts/$ vs 20.0 pts/$ for the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 — making the Core i5-3470T the 124.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-3470T | Celeron Dual-Core T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $184 | $150-18% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35-77% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 85.7+329% | 20.0 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-3470T and Celeron Dual-Core T1600
