Core i5-3470T vs PRO A10-8770E

Core i5-3470T vs PRO A10-8770E Performance Spectrum

Core i5-3470T

2 / 4

2,999

0.0%

3,001

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Ryzen AI Max 390

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-3470T vs PRO A10-8770E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-3470T vs PRO A10-8770E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-3470T

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $211 less on MSRP ($184 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).
✅Delivers 114.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($184 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A10-8770E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,999 vs 3,001).

PRO A10-8770E

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 16.3 PassMark/$ ($395 MSRP vs $184 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A10-8770E better than Core i5-3470T?

Yes. PRO A10-8770E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, PRO A10-8770E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, PRO A10-8770E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A10-8770E is still the much better call for a fresh build. PRO A10-8770E comes in 114.7% more expensive on MSRP at $395 MSRP versus $184 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-3470T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 114.5% better value on paper (16.3 vs 7.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A10-8770E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-3470T vs PRO A10-8770E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3470T

The Core i5-3470T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,999 points. Launch price was $210.

PRO A10-8770E

The PRO A10-8770E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,001 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-3470T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the PRO A10-8770E offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A10-8770E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-3470T versus 3.5 GHz on the PRO A10-8770E — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-3470T (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-3470T uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the PRO A10-8770E uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3470T scores 2,999 against the PRO A10-8770E's 3,001 — a 0.1% lead for the PRO A10-8770E.

Feature	Core i5-3470T	PRO A10-8770E
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+3%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+4%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	2,999	3,001

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3470T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A10-8770E uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-3470T	PRO A10-8770E
Socket	LGA1155	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-3470T was priced at $184, while the PRO A10-8770E came in at $395. On launch pricing ($184 vs $395), Core i5-3470T was $211 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3470T delivers 16.3 pts/$ vs 7.6 pts/$ for the PRO A10-8770E — making the Core i5-3470T the 72.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-3470T	PRO A10-8770E
MSRP	$184-53%	$395
Performance per Dollar	16.3+114%	7.6
Release Date	2012	2016

Search Core i5-3470T on Amazon

Search PRO A10-8770E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.