A8 PRO-7600B vs Core i5-3470T

A8 PRO-7600B vs Core i5-3470T Performance Spectrum

A8 PRO-7600B

4 / 4

3,001

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Ryzen AI Max 390

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-3470T

2 / 4

2,999

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8 PRO-7600B vs Core i5-3470T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8 PRO-7600B vs Core i5-3470T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8 PRO-7600B

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7 Graphics, while Core i5-3470T needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i5-3470T.

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Core i5-3470T

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8 PRO-7600B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,999 vs 3,001).
❌Launch MSRP is still $184 MSRP, while A8 PRO-7600B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8 PRO-7600B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8 PRO-7600B.

Quick Answers

So, is A8 PRO-7600B better than Core i5-3470T?

Yes. A8 PRO-7600B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8 PRO-7600B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8 PRO-7600B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8 PRO-7600B is still the much better call for a fresh build. A8 PRO-7600B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $184 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-3470T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (16.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8 PRO-7600B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8 PRO-7600B vs Core i5-3470T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8 PRO-7600B

The A8 PRO-7600B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,001 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-3470T

The Core i5-3470T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,999 points. Launch price was $210.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8 PRO-7600B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3470T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8 PRO-7600B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A8 PRO-7600B versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-3470T — a 5.4% clock advantage for the A8 PRO-7600B (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A8 PRO-7600B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-3470T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8 PRO-7600B scores 3,001 against the Core i5-3470T's 2,999 — a 0.1% lead for the A8 PRO-7600B.

Feature	A8 PRO-7600B	Core i5-3470T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+6%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+7%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	3,001	2,999

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8 PRO-7600B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3470T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8 PRO-7600B	Core i5-3470T
Socket	FM2+	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	64	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A8 PRO-7600B) / not specified (Core i5-3470T). The A8 PRO-7600B includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7 Graphics), while the Core i5-3470T requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8 PRO-7600B rivals Core i3-4150.