Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 vs FirePro W4300

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

2023Core: 1855 MHzBoost: 2495 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

FirePro W4300

2015Core: 930 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 vs FirePro W4300 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 vs FirePro W4300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $260 less on MSRP ($119 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (837 vs 2,719).
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 490% higher power demand at 295W vs 50W.

FirePro W4300

2015

Why buy it

  • +224.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 295W, a 245W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro W4300 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 224.9% in PassMark G3D (2,719 vs 837), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 96 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W4300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $260 more expensive on MSRP at $379 vs $119, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2% (7.2 vs 7.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FirePro W4300 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 vs FirePro W4300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 837 points. Launch price was $3,999.

AMD

FirePro W4300

The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 scores 837 versus the FirePro W4300's 2,719 — the FirePro W4300 leads by 224.9%. The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the FirePro W4300 uses GCN 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) vs 768 (FirePro W4300). Raw compute: 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) vs 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300).

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A8-9600FirePro W4300
G3D Mark Score
837
2,719+225%
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
GCN 2.0
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
6144+700%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
61.32 TFLOPS+4194%
1.428 TFLOPS
ROPs
192+1100%
16
TMUs
384+700%
48
L1 Cache
3 MB+1479%
0.19 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB+2300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A8-9600FirePro W4300
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro W4300 carries 4 GB. FirePro W4300 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 and 64-bit on the FirePro W4300. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro W4300) — the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A8-9600FirePro W4300
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
6 MB+2300%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 draws 295W versus the FirePro W4300's 50W — a 142% difference. The FirePro W4300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) vs 350W (FirePro W4300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A8-9600FirePro W4300
TDP
295W
50W-83%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
171mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
71°C
Perf/Watt
2.8
54.4+1843%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 came in at $119, while the FirePro W4300 launched at $379. On MSRP, Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 was 68.6% cheaper ($260 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) vs 7.2 (FirePro W4300) — the FirePro W4300 offers 2.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 (2023 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A8-9600FirePro W4300
MSRP
$119-69%
$379
Performance per Dollar
7.0
7.2+3%
Codename
Navi 31
Bonaire
Release
April 13 2023
December 1 2015
Ranking
#26
#590

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.