A8 PRO-7600B
VS
Core i7-940

A8 PRO-7600B vs Core i7-940

AMD

A8 PRO-7600B

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i7-940

4 Cores8 Thrd1 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8 PRO-7600B is positioned at rank 355 and the Core i7-940 is on rank 1071, so the A8 PRO-7600B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8 PRO-7600B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5194%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4907%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3563%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1073%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
850%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
744%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
426%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
420%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
383%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
383%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
379%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
368%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
363%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
362%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
358%
#314
Core i7-10700
MSRP: $365|Avg: $268
100%
#315
Core i5-9600K
MSRP: $263|Avg: $178
100%
#316
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1400
99%
#317
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
99%
#318
Core i3-10305T
MSRP: $143|Avg: $143
99%
#319
Ryzen Embedded V1202B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
98%
#320
Core i3-10100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $146
97%
#321
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
97%
#355
A8 PRO-7600B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#364
Celeron G3920
MSRP: $40|Avg: $30
98%
#366
Ryzen 3 1200
MSRP: $109|Avg: $50
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-940

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
57832%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
54646%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
39677%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
11953%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
9468%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
8283%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
4744%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
4682%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
4263%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
4263%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
4215%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
4101%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
4044%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
4028%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3991%
#1071
Core i7-940
MSRP: $562|Avg: $90
100%
#1072
Celeron 2.40
MSRP: $69|Avg: $13
93%
#1073
Sempron 2800+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $29
91%
#1074
Athlon 64 3100+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
88%
#1075
Sempron 3600+
MSRP: $105|Avg: $20
86%
#1076
Celeron 2.80
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
79%
#1077
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
MSRP: $450|Avg: $20
75%
#1078
Athlon 64 3600+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $15
74%
#1079
Core 2 Quad Q6700
MSRP: $530|Avg: $50
73%
#1080
Athlon 64 2600+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
73%
#1081
Celeron 2.20
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
72%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
66%
#1083
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
MSRP: $328|Avg: $10
66%
#1084
Core i7-975
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
65%
#1085
Athlon XP 2600+
MSRP: $98|Avg: $10
64%
#1086
Core i7-965
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $40
63%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A8 PRO-7600B (2014) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3-2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA8 PRO-7600BCore i7-940
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($90)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-940 (2008) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA8 PRO-7600BCore i7-940
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($90)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8 PRO-7600B and Core i7-940

AMD

A8 PRO-7600B

The A8 PRO-7600B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,001 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-940

The Core i7-940 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Novembro 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,029 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The A8 PRO-7600B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-940's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A8 PRO-7600B versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-940 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the A8 PRO-7600B (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The A8 PRO-7600B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-940 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A8 PRO-7600B scores 3,001 against the Core i7-940's 3,029 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-940.

FeatureA8 PRO-7600BCore i7-940
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+19%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+6%
2.93 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+1500%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark
3,001
3,029
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8 PRO-7600B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-940 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the A8 PRO-7600B versus DDR3-1066 on the Core i7-940 — the A8 PRO-7600B supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8 PRO-7600B supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 24 GB 90.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A8 PRO-7600B) vs 3 (Core i7-940). PCIe lanes: 16 (A8 PRO-7600B) vs 36 (Core i7-940) — the Core i7-940 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA8 PRO-7600BCore i7-940
Socket
FM2+
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
2133+71000%
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
64
24 GB+39321500%
RAM Channels
2
3+50%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
36+125%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8 PRO-7600B) vs VT-x (Core i7-940). The A8 PRO-7600B includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7 Graphics), while the Core i7-940 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-940 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A8 PRO-7600B rivals Core i3-4150.

FeatureA8 PRO-7600BCore i7-940
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon R7 Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x
Target Use
Desktop