
A8 PRO-7600B

Core i7-940
A8 PRO-7600B vs Core i7-940 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A8 PRO-7600B vs Core i7-940 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A8 PRO-7600B vs Core i7-940: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A8 PRO-7600B
2014Why buy it
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7 Graphics, while Core i7-940 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i7-940.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-940 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,001 vs 3,029).
- ❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.
Core i7-940
2008Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
- ✅125% more PCIe lanes (36 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $562 MSRP, while A8 PRO-7600B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A8 PRO-7600B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8 PRO-7600B.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-940 better than A8 PRO-7600B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A8 PRO-7600B vs Core i7-940 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8 PRO-7600B
The A8 PRO-7600B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,001 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i7-940
The Core i7-940 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Novembro 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,029 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The A8 PRO-7600B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-940's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A8 PRO-7600B versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-940 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the A8 PRO-7600B (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The A8 PRO-7600B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-940 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A8 PRO-7600B scores 3,001 against the Core i7-940's 3,029 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-940.
| Feature | A8 PRO-7600B | Core i7-940 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+19% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+6% | 2.93 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+1500% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Bloomfield (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 3,001 | 3,029 |
Memory & Platform
The A8 PRO-7600B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-940 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the A8 PRO-7600B versus DDR3-1066 on the Core i7-940 — the A8 PRO-7600B supports 100.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8 PRO-7600B supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 24 GB — 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A8 PRO-7600B) vs 3 (Core i7-940). PCIe lanes: 16 (A8 PRO-7600B) vs 36 (Core i7-940) — the Core i7-940 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A8 PRO-7600B | Core i7-940 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2133+100% | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+167% | 24 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 3+50% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 36+125% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8 PRO-7600B) vs VT-x (Core i7-940). The A8 PRO-7600B includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7 Graphics), while the Core i7-940 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-940 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A8 PRO-7600B rivals Core i3-4150.
| Feature | A8 PRO-7600B | Core i7-940 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















