
Core i5-3570K

Xeon E5-2420
Core i5-3570K vs Xeon E5-2420 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-3570K vs Xeon E5-2420 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-3570K vs Xeon E5-2420: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-3570K
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 77W instead of 95W, a 18W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4000, while Xeon E5-2420 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2420.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2420 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,971 vs 5,012).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2420, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2420 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2420
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌23.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 77W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3570K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-3570K.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2420 better than Core i5-3570K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-3570K vs Xeon E5-2420 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3570K
The Core i5-3570K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,971 points. Launch price was $235.

Xeon E5-2420
The Xeon E5-2420 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,012 points. Launch price was $390.
Processing Power
The Core i5-3570K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2420 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2420 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-3570K versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2420 — a 45.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-3570K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i5-3570K uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2420 uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3570K scores 4,971 against the Xeon E5-2420's 5,012 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E5-2420. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-3570K vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2420.
| Feature | Core i5-3570K | Xeon E5-2420 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+58% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+79% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 15360 kB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) |
| PassMark | 4,971 | 5,012 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-3570K uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2420 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-3570K | Xeon E5-2420 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1356 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i5-3570K) / not specified (Xeon E5-2420). The Core i5-3570K includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Xeon E5-2420 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3570K targets Legacy Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-3570K rivals FX-8350.
| Feature | Core i5-3570K | Xeon E5-2420 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4000 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Legacy Gaming Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














