PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-3570T vs Xeon X5672 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-3570T vs Xeon X5672: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-3570T

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $106 less on MSRP ($194 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 55.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.1 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($194 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5672 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5672, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon X5672

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,036 vs 5,055).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.8 vs 26.1 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $194 MSRP).
❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3570T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-3570T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-3570T better than Xeon X5672?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5672 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-3570T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3570T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-3570T is the better buy right now. Core i5-3570T comes in $106 cheaper on MSRP at $194 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon X5672 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 55.2% better value on MSRP (26.1 vs 16.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-3570T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-3570T vs Xeon X5672 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3570T

The Core i5-3570T is manufactured by Intel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,055 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon X5672

The Xeon X5672 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,036 points. Launch price was $115.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon X5672 is built on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-3570T scores 5,055 against the Xeon X5672's 5,036 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-3570T.

Feature	Core i5-3570T	Xeon X5672
Cores / Threads	—	4 / 8
Boost Clock	—	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	—	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	256 kB (per core)
Process	—	32 nm
Architecture	—	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	5,055	5,036
Geekbench 6 Single	657	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-3570T versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5672 — the Core i5-3570T supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-3570T) vs 3 (Xeon X5672). Chipset compatibility: H61,B75,H77,Z75,Z77 (Core i5-3570T) and Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5672).

Feature	Core i5-3570T	Xeon X5672
Socket	—	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	3+50%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core i5-3570T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2500), while the Xeon X5672 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3570T targets Legacy Low Power Desktop, Xeon X5672 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-3570T rivals A8-5600K; Xeon X5672 rivals Core i7-980X.

Feature	Core i5-3570T	Xeon X5672
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 2500	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Legacy Low Power Desktop	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-3570T was priced at $194, while the Xeon X5672 came in at $300. On launch pricing ($194 vs $300), Core i5-3570T was $106 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3570T delivers 26.1 pts/$ vs 16.8 pts/$ for the Xeon X5672 — making the Core i5-3570T the 43.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-3570T	Xeon X5672
MSRP	$194-35%	$300
Performance per Dollar	26.1+55%	16.8
Release Date	2012	2011

Search Core i5-3570T on Amazon

Search Xeon X5672 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.