Core i5-4200U vs Pro A10-8700B

Core i5-4200U vs Pro A10-8700B Performance Spectrum

Core i5-4200U

2 / 4

2,176

+0.3%

2,170

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4200U vs Pro A10-8700B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4200U vs Pro A10-8700B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4200U

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while Pro A10-8700B needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Pro A10-8700B

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,170 vs 2,176).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4200U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pro A10-8700B better than Core i5-4200U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pro A10-8700B is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 29 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4200U pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4200U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pro A10-8700B still makes the most sense overall. Pro A10-8700B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 29 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pro A10-8700B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-4200U vs Pro A10-8700B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4200U

The Core i5-4200U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,176 points. Launch price was $69.

Pro A10-8700B

The Pro A10-8700B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,170 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4200U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Pro A10-8700B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pro A10-8700B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core i5-4200U versus 3.2 GHz on the Pro A10-8700B — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Pro A10-8700B (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i5-4200U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Pro A10-8700B uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4200U scores 2,176 against the Pro A10-8700B's 2,170 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-4200U.

Feature	Core i5-4200U	Pro A10-8700B
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	3.2 GHz+23%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	1.8 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	2,176	2,170
Geekbench 6 Single	733	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4200U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pro A10-8700B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4200U	Pro A10-8700B
Socket	FCBGA1168	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4200U) / not specified (Pro A10-8700B). The Core i5-4200U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Pro A10-8700B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4200U targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4200U rivals A6-5350M.