Core i5-4200U
VS
Pro A10-8700B

Core i5-4200U vs Pro A10-8700B

Intel

Core i5-4200U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Pro A10-8700B

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-4200U is positioned at rank 243 and the Pro A10-8700B is on rank 519, so the Core i5-4200U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4200U

#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
99%
#231
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
405%
#232
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
399%
#233
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
366%
#234
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
364%
#235
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
361%
#237
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
349%
#238
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
334%
#239
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
334%
#240
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
325%
#243
Core i5-4200U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pro A10-8700B

#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
97%
#507
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
676%
#508
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
666%
#509
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
612%
#510
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
609%
#511
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
603%
#513
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
582%
#514
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
559%
#515
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
558%
#516
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
543%
#519
Pro A10-8700B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pro A10-8700B leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i5-4200U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-4200UPro A10-8700B
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-4200UPro A10-8700B
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4200U and Pro A10-8700B

Intel

Core i5-4200U

The Core i5-4200U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,176 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Pro A10-8700B

The Pro A10-8700B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,170 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i5-4200U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Pro A10-8700B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pro A10-8700B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core i5-4200U versus 3.2 GHz on the Pro A10-8700B — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Pro A10-8700B (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i5-4200U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Pro A10-8700B uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4200U scores 2,176 against the Pro A10-8700B's 2,170 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-4200U.

FeatureCore i5-4200UPro A10-8700B
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
3.2 GHz+23%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
1.8 GHz+12%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2048 kB+700%
Process
22 nm-21%
28 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark
2,176
2,170
Geekbench 6 Single
733
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4200U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pro A10-8700B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-4200UPro A10-8700B
Socket
FCBGA1168
FP4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4200U) / not specified (Pro A10-8700B). The Core i5-4200U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Pro A10-8700B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4200U targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4200U rivals A6-5350M.

FeatureCore i5-4200UPro A10-8700B
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4400
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Thin & Light Laptop