Atom x7211RE vs Core i5-4200U

Intel

Atom x7211RE

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-4200U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Atom x7211RE vs Core i5-4200U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7211RE vs Core i5-4200U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7211RE vs Core i5-4200U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7211RE

2024

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
  • Draws 6W instead of 512W, a 506W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1168 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i5-4200U

2013

Why buy it

  • 50% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,176 vs 2,188).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
  • 8433.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 6W.
  • Older platform position on FCBGA1168, while Atom x7211RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7211RE better than Core i5-4200U?
Yes. Atom x7211RE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Atom x7211RE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7211RE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Atom x7211RE still makes the most sense overall. Atom x7211RE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom x7211RE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2013), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1168, 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7211RE vs Core i5-4200U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Atom x7211RE

The Atom x7211RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,188 points. Launch price was $42.

Intel

Core i5-4200U

The Core i5-4200U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,176 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Atom x7211RE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4200U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211RE versus 2.6 GHz on the Core i5-4200U — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Atom x7211RE (base: 1 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Atom x7211RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-4200U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7211RE scores 2,188 against the Core i5-4200U's 2,176 — a 0.5% lead for the Atom x7211RE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7211RE vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-4200U.

FeatureAtom x7211RECore i5-4200U
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+23%
2.6 GHz
Base Clock
1 GHz
1.6 GHz+60%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+100%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)
256K (per core)+12700%
Process
10 nm-55%
22 nm
Architecture
Amston Lake (2024−2025)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,188
2,176
Geekbench 6 Single
733
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7211RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-4200U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5-4800 on the Atom x7211RE versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4200U — the Atom x7211RE supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom x7211RE supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7211RE) vs 2 (Core i5-4200U). PCIe lanes: 8 (Atom x7211RE) vs 12 (Core i5-4200U) — the Core i5-4200U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7211RE) and HM86,HM87,QM87 (Core i5-4200U).

FeatureAtom x7211RECore i5-4200U
Socket
FCBGA1264
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5-4800+200%
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+100%
16 GB
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
8
12+50%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Atom x7211RE) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4200U). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics (16 EU) (Atom x7211RE) and HD Graphics 4400 (Core i5-4200U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom x7211RE targets Embedded, Core i5-4200U targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4200U rivals A6-5350M.

FeatureAtom x7211RECore i5-4200U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics (16 EU)
HD Graphics 4400
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Embedded
Thin & Light Laptop