Atom x7211RE
VS
Celeron J3455E

Atom x7211RE vs Celeron J3455E

Intel

Atom x7211RE

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Celeron J3455E

4 Cores4 Thrd10 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Atom x7211RE is positioned at rank #515 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x7211RE

#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
99%
#503
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
670%
#504
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
661%
#505
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
606%
#506
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
604%
#507
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
598%
#509
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
578%
#510
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
554%
#511
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
553%
#512
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
538%
#515
Atom x7211RE
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Atom x7211RE leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron J3455E is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAtom x7211RECeleron J3455E
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Amston Lake (2024−2025) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom x7211RECeleron J3455E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom x7211RE and Celeron J3455E

Intel

Atom x7211RE

The Atom x7211RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,188 points. Launch price was $42.

Intel

Celeron J3455E

The Celeron J3455E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 2,193 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Atom x7211RE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron J3455E offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J3455E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211RE versus 2.3 GHz on the Celeron J3455E — a 32.7% clock advantage for the Atom x7211RE (base: 1 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Atom x7211RE is built on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Atom x7211RE scores 2,188 against the Celeron J3455E's 2,193 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron J3455E. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7211RE vs 2 MB on the Celeron J3455E.

FeatureAtom x7211RECeleron J3455E
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+39%
2.3 GHz
Base Clock
1 GHz
1.5 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+200%
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Amston Lake (2024−2025)
PassMark
2,188
2,193
Geekbench 6 Single
450
Geekbench 6 Multi
850
🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5-4800 on the Atom x7211RE versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron J3455E — the Atom x7211RE supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom x7211RE supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7211RE) vs 2 (Celeron J3455E). PCIe lanes: 8 (Atom x7211RE) vs 6 (Celeron J3455E) — the Atom x7211RE offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7211RE) and N/A (SoC) (Celeron J3455E).

FeatureAtom x7211RECeleron J3455E
Socket
FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5-4800+25%
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+300%
8 GB
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8+33%
6
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Atom x7211RE) vs VT-x (Celeron J3455E). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics (16 EU) (Atom x7211RE) and HD Graphics 500 (Celeron J3455E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom x7211RE targets Embedded, Celeron J3455E targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J3455E rivals Pentium J4205.

FeatureAtom x7211RECeleron J3455E
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics (16 EU)
HD Graphics 500
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x
Target Use
Embedded
Low Power