CPU
GPU
Atom x7211RE
Core 2 Quad Q9505
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom x7211RE is positioned at rank 515 and the Core 2 Quad Q9505 is on rank 993, so the Atom x7211RE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom x7211RE
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q9505
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom x7211RE | Core 2 Quad Q9505 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Amston Lake (2024−2025) / 10 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom x7211RE | Core 2 Quad Q9505 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom x7211RE and Core 2 Quad Q9505
Atom x7211RE
The Atom x7211RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,188 points. Launch price was $42.
Core 2 Quad Q9505
The Core 2 Quad Q9505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.83 GHz, with boost up to 0.83 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,176 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The Atom x7211RE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core 2 Quad Q9505 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q9505 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211RE versus 0.83 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9505 — a 117.6% clock advantage for the Atom x7211RE (base: 1 GHz vs 2.83 GHz). The Atom x7211RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core 2 Quad Q9505 uses Yorkfield (2007−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7211RE scores 2,188 against the Core 2 Quad Q9505's 2,176 — a 0.5% lead for the Atom x7211RE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7211RE vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Quad Q9505.
| Feature | Atom x7211RE | Core 2 Quad Q9505 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+286% | 0.83 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 2.83 GHz+183% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 6 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 6 MB (total)+200% |
| Process | 10 nm-78% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Amston Lake (2024−2025) | Yorkfield (2007−2009) |
| PassMark | 2,188 | 2,176 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x7211RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core 2 Quad Q9505 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5-4800 on the Atom x7211RE versus DDR3-1333 on the Core 2 Quad Q9505 — the Atom x7211RE supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom x7211RE supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7211RE) vs 2 (Core 2 Quad Q9505). PCIe lanes: 8 (Atom x7211RE) vs 0 (Core 2 Quad Q9505) — the Atom x7211RE offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Atom x7211RE | Core 2 Quad Q9505 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+264% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-4800+67% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Atom x7211RE) vs VT-x (Core 2 Quad Q9505). The Atom x7211RE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (16 EU)), while the Core 2 Quad Q9505 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom x7211RE targets Embedded, Core 2 Quad Q9505 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Atom x7211RE | Core 2 Quad Q9505 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics (16 EU) | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x |
| Target Use | Embedded | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Atom x7211RE and Core 2 Quad Q9505
