Atom x7211RE vs Core m3-6Y30

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7211RE vs Core m3-6Y30 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7211RE vs Core m3-6Y30: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7211RE

2024

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 6W instead of 512W, a 506W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1515 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics (16 EU), while Core m3-6Y30 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core m3-6Y30

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,180 vs 2,188).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Atom x7211RE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌8433.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 6W.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1515, while Atom x7211RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7211RE better than Core m3-6Y30?

Yes. Atom x7211RE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom x7211RE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7211RE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x7211RE is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Atom x7211RE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core m3-6Y30 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 1.6% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7211RE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2015), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1515, 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7211RE vs Core m3-6Y30 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7211RE

The Atom x7211RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,188 points. Launch price was $42.

Core m3-6Y30

The Core m3-6Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,180 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7211RE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core m3-6Y30's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211RE versus 2.2 GHz on the Core m3-6Y30 — a 37% clock advantage for the Atom x7211RE (base: 1 GHz vs 0.9 GHz). The Atom x7211RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core m3-6Y30 uses Skylake-Y (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7211RE scores 2,188 against the Core m3-6Y30's 2,180 — a 0.4% lead for the Atom x7211RE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7211RE vs 4 MB (total) on the Core m3-6Y30.

Feature	Atom x7211RE	Core m3-6Y30
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+45%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	1 GHz+11%	0.9 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Amston Lake (2024−2025)	Skylake-Y (2015)
PassMark	2,188	2,180

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7211RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core m3-6Y30 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom x7211RE	Core m3-6Y30
Socket	FCBGA1264	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Atom x7211RE) / not specified (Core m3-6Y30). The Atom x7211RE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (16 EU)), while the Core m3-6Y30 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom x7211RE targets Embedded.