Atom x7211RE
VS
Pentium G4400TE

Atom x7211RE vs Pentium G4400TE

Intel

Atom x7211RE

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Pentium G4400TE

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom x7211RE is positioned at rank 515 and the Pentium G4400TE is on rank 1044, so the Atom x7211RE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x7211RE

#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
99%
#503
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
670%
#504
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
661%
#505
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
606%
#506
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
604%
#507
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
598%
#509
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
578%
#510
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
554%
#511
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
553%
#512
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
538%
#515
Atom x7211RE
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G4400TE

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
42701%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
40348%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
29296%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8826%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6991%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
6116%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3503%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3457%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3148%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3147%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3112%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3028%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2986%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2974%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2947%
#1044
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
100%
#1045
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
99%
#1046
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
98%
#1047
Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP: $215|Avg: $34
97%
#1048
Core 2 Duo E8200
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
96%
#1049
Core 2 Quad Q9450
MSRP: $316|Avg: $15
96%
#1050
Core 2 Duo E8600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $95
94%
#1051
Core 2 Duo E6320
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
94%
#1052
Core i7-980X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
93%
#1053
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
93%
#1054
Core 2 Duo E6420
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
92%
#1055
Phenom X4 9600B
MSRP: $278|Avg: $20
91%
#1056
Pentium D 940
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
91%
#1057
Phenom II X3 B77
MSRP: $281|Avg: $35
90%
#1058
Core 2 Duo E6300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
89%
#1059
Core 2 Duo E6400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom x7211RE (2024) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom x7211REPentium G4400TE
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Amston Lake (2024−2025) / 10 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium G4400TE (2015) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR3L-1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom x7211REPentium G4400TE
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom x7211RE and Pentium G4400TE

Intel

Atom x7211RE

The Atom x7211RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,188 points. Launch price was $42.

Intel

Pentium G4400TE

The Pentium G4400TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,190 points. Launch price was $64.

Processing Power

Both the Atom x7211RE and Pentium G4400TE share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211RE versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium G4400TE — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Atom x7211RE. The Atom x7211RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Pentium G4400TE uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7211RE scores 2,188 against the Pentium G4400TE's 2,190 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium G4400TE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7211RE vs 3 MB on the Pentium G4400TE.

FeatureAtom x7211REPentium G4400TE
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+33%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
1 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+100%
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+300%
512 kB
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Amston Lake (2024−2025)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
2,188
2,190
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7211RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Pentium G4400TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5-4800 on the Atom x7211RE versus DDR4-2133 on the Pentium G4400TE — the Atom x7211RE supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G4400TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7211RE) vs 2 (Pentium G4400TE). PCIe lanes: 8 (Atom x7211RE) vs 16 (Pentium G4400TE) — the Pentium G4400TE offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureAtom x7211REPentium G4400TE
Socket
FCBGA1264
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5-4800+25%
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
64 GB+100%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Atom x7211RE) vs VT-x (Pentium G4400TE). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics (16 EU) (Atom x7211RE) and HD Graphics 510 (Pentium G4400TE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom x7211RE targets Embedded, Pentium G4400TE targets Desktop.

FeatureAtom x7211REPentium G4400TE
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics (16 EU)
HD Graphics 510
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x
Target Use
Embedded
Desktop