Atom x7211RE vs Phenom II X4 920

Atom x7211RE vs Phenom II X4 920 Performance Spectrum

Atom x7211RE

2 / 2

2,188

0.0%

2,202

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7211RE vs Phenom II X4 920 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7211RE vs Phenom II X4 920: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7211RE

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 125W, a 119W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of AM3 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics (16 EU), while Phenom II X4 920 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,188 vs 2,202).

Phenom II X4 920

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌1983.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 6W.
❌Older platform position on AM3, while Atom x7211RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7211RE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7211RE better than Phenom II X4 920?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom x7211RE is ahead with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 920 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 920 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x7211RE still makes the most sense overall. Atom x7211RE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7211RE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2009) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of AM3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7211RE vs Phenom II X4 920 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7211RE

The Atom x7211RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,188 points. Launch price was $42.

Phenom II X4 920

The Phenom II X4 920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,202 points. Launch price was $90.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7211RE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X4 920 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 920 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211RE versus 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X4 920 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Atom x7211RE (base: 1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Atom x7211RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Phenom II X4 920 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7211RE scores 2,188 against the Phenom II X4 920's 2,202 — a 0.6% lead for the Phenom II X4 920. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom x7211RE	Phenom II X4 920
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+14%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	1 GHz	2.8 GHz+180%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-78%	45 nm
Architecture	Amston Lake (2024−2025)	Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark	2,188	2,202

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7211RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Phenom II X4 920 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom x7211RE	Phenom II X4 920
Socket	FCBGA1264	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+100%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Atom x7211RE) / not specified (Phenom II X4 920). The Atom x7211RE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (16 EU)), while the Phenom II X4 920 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom x7211RE targets Embedded.