Core i5-4202Y vs Xeon E5335

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4202Y vs Xeon E5335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4202Y vs Xeon E5335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4202Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4200, while Xeon E5335 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5335, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌540% higher power demand at 512W vs 80W.

Xeon E5335

2006

Why buy it

✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
✅Draws 80W instead of 512W, a 432W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,549 vs 1,552).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4202Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4202Y better than Xeon E5335?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5335 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-4202Y is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4202Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4202Y still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-4202Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% higher PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4202Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-4202Y vs Xeon E5335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4202Y

The Core i5-4202Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,552 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E5335

The Xeon E5335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,549 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4202Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5335 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5335 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i5-4202Y versus 2 GHz on the Xeon E5335 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-4202Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5335 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4202Y scores 1,552 against the Xeon E5335's 1,549 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-4202Y. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-4202Y vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5335.

Feature	Core i5-4202Y	Xeon E5335
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	3 MB	8 MB L2 Cache+167%
L2 Cache	512 kB	4 MB (total)+700%
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Clovertown (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,552	1,549
Geekbench 6 Single	589	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,030	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4202Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5335 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4202Y	Xeon E5335
Socket	FCBGA1168	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600 / LPDDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x / EPT (Core i5-4202Y) / not specified (Xeon E5335). The Core i5-4202Y includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4200), while the Xeon E5335 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4202Y targets Ultra-portable.