Core i5-4210H vs Opteron X3418

Core i5-4210H vs Opteron X3418 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-4210H

2 / 4

3,084

+1.3%

Core i5-520M

Pentium G3258

Pentium G4500T

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

3,043

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4210H vs Opteron X3418 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4210H vs Opteron X3418: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4210H

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Opteron X3418 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron X3418, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.

Opteron X3418

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,043 vs 3,084).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4210H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4210H better than Opteron X3418?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron X3418 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-4210H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-4210H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 41 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4210H is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4210H still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-4210H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 41 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Opteron X3418 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-4210H vs Opteron X3418 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4210H

The Core i5-4210H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,084 points. Launch price was $225.

Opteron X3418

The Opteron X3418 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,043 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4210H packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron X3418 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron X3418 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-4210H versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron X3418 — a 9% clock advantage for the Core i5-4210H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i5-4210H uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron X3418 uses Excavator (2017−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4210H scores 3,084 against the Opteron X3418's 3,043 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i5-4210H.

Feature	Core i5-4210H	Opteron X3418
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+9%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+61%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	2 MB (total)+300%
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Excavator (2017−2018)
PassMark	3,084+1%	3,043
Geekbench 6 Single	1,020	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,916	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4210H uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron X3418 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4210H	Opteron X3418
Socket	BGA1364	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core i5-4210H) / not specified (Opteron X3418). The Core i5-4210H includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Opteron X3418 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4210H targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-4210H rivals Ryzen 5 3550H.