A10-6700 vs Core i5-4210H

A10-6700 vs Core i5-4210H Performance Spectrum

A10-6700

4 / 4

3,109

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-4210H

2 / 4

3,084

0.0%

Core i5-520M

Pentium G3258

Pentium G4500T

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-6700 vs Core i5-4210H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-6700 vs Core i5-4210H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-6700

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-4210H.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i5-4210H

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-6700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,084 vs 3,109).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6700.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-6700 better than Core i5-4210H?

Yes. A10-6700 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-6700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-6700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-6700 still makes the most sense overall. A10-6700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4210H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-6700 vs Core i5-4210H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6700

The A10-6700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,109 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i5-4210H

The Core i5-4210H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,084 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-6700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4210H offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-6700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-6700 versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-4210H — a 20.5% clock advantage for the A10-6700 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A10-6700 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-4210H uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6700 scores 3,109 against the Core i5-4210H's 3,084 — a 0.8% lead for the A10-6700. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 438 vs 1,020, a 79.8% lead for the Core i5-4210H that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-6700 vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4210H.

Feature	A10-6700	Core i5-4210H
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+23%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+28%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	4096 kB+700%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,109	3,084
Geekbench 6 Single	438	1,020+133%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,916

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6700 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4210H uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-6700 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4210H — the A10-6700 supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A85X,A88X (A10-6700) and 8-series (Core i5-4210H).

Feature	A10-6700	Core i5-4210H
Socket	FM2	BGA1364
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+17%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-6700) vs VT-x (Core i5-4210H). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8670D (A10-6700) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i5-4210H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6700 targets Budget, Core i5-4210H targets Gaming. Direct competitor: A10-6700 rivals Core i3-3240; Core i5-4210H rivals Ryzen 5 3550H.