
Radeon R7 A8-7650K

Radeon RX 6700
Radeon R7 A8-7650K vs Radeon RX 6700 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R7 A8-7650K vs Radeon RX 6700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R7 A8-7650K vs Radeon RX 6700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R7 A8-7650K
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 175W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 10 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 49.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Radeon RX 6700
2021Why buy it
- ✅1786.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅1900% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (10 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌483.3% higher power demand at 175W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 A8-7650K vs Radeon RX 6700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 A8-7650K
The Radeon R7 A8-7650K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 757 points.

Radeon RX 6700
The Radeon RX 6700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,920 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 A8-7650K scores 757 versus the Radeon RX 6700's 18,920 — the Radeon RX 6700 leads by 2399.3%. The Radeon R7 A8-7650K is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon RX 6700 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 A8-7650K) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700). Raw compute: 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7650K) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700). Boost clocks: 825 MHz vs 2450 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7650K | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 757 | 18,920+2399% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2304+500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6336 TFLOPS | 11.29 TFLOPS+1682% |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | 2450 MHz+197% |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 24 | 144+500% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 512 KB+433% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6700 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon R7 A8-7650K does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7650K | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 A8-7650K has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700 carries 10 GB. Radeon RX 6700 gives you 1900% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-7650K and 160-bit on the Radeon RX 6700. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 A8-7650K) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700) — the Radeon RX 6700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7650K | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 10 GB+1900% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 320 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 160-bit+25% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 A8-7650K) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7650K | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 A8-7650K) vs VCE (Radeon RX 6700). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 A8-7650K) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7650K | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 A8-7650K draws 30W versus the Radeon RX 6700's 175W — a 141.5% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-7650K is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7650K) vs 550W (Radeon RX 6700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7650K | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-83% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 25.2 | 108.1+329% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R7 A8-7650K came in at $0, while the Radeon RX 6700 launched at $379. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A8-7650K was 100+% cheaper ($379 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon R7 A8-7650K) vs 49.9 (Radeon RX 6700) — the Radeon R7 A8-7650K offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6700 (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7650K | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $379 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 49.9 |
| Codename | Opal | Navi 22 |
| Release | January 9 2014 | June 9 2021 |
| Ranking | #890 | #90 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














