
Radeon HD 6650M

Radeon R7 A8-7650K
Radeon HD 6650M vs Radeon R7 A8-7650K Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 6650M vs Radeon R7 A8-7650K FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 6650M vs Radeon R7 A8-7650K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 6650M
2011Why buy it
- ✅69.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
Radeon R7 A8-7650K
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6650M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6650M vs Radeon R7 A8-7650K Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 6650M
The Radeon HD 6650M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 580 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 762 points.

Radeon R7 A8-7650K
The Radeon R7 A8-7650K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 757 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6650M scores 762 and the Radeon R7 A8-7650K reaches 757 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6650M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 A8-7650K uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 960 (Radeon HD 6650M) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A8-7650K). Raw compute: 1.114 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6650M) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7650K).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6650M | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 762 | 757 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 960+150% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.114 TFLOPS+76% | 0.6336 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 48+100% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+100% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6650M | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6650M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A8-7650K carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 6650M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon HD 6650M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-7650K. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6650M) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 A8-7650K) — the Radeon HD 6650M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6650M | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FL11_0) (Radeon HD 6650M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 A8-7650K). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6650M | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 (FL11_0) | 12 (12_0)+7% |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD3.1 (Radeon HD 6650M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 A8-7650K). Decoder: VCE vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6650M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 A8-7650K).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6650M | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD3.1 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCE | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6650M draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7650K's 30W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-7650K is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6650M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7650K). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6650M | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 30W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 15.2 | 25.2+66% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R7 A8-7650K (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6650M | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | Blackcomb | Opal |
| Release | January 4 2011 | January 9 2014 |
| Ranking | #785 | #890 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














