Quadro K1000M vs Radeon HD 6650M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K1000M vs Radeon HD 6650M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K1000M vs Radeon HD 6650M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K1000M

2013

Why buy it

✅15.8% more average FPS across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 6650M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K1000M across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K1000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.8% in average FPS across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 6650M instead at 762 vs 756, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K1000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K1000M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro K1000M vs Radeon HD 6650M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K1000M

The Quadro K1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 756 points.

Radeon HD 6650M

The Radeon HD 6650M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 580 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 762 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K1000M scores 756 and the Radeon HD 6650M reaches 762 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K1000M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6650M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K1000M) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6650M). Raw compute: 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K1000M) vs 1.114 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6650M).

Feature	Quadro K1000M	Radeon HD 6650M
G3D Mark Score	756	762
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1536+60%	960
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.369 TFLOPS+113%	1.114 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128+167%	48
L1 Cache	128 KB	192 KB+50%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K1000M	Radeon HD 6650M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K1000M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6650M carries 1 GB. Quadro K1000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K1000M and System on the Radeon HD 6650M.

Feature	Quadro K1000M	Radeon HD 6650M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K1000M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 6650M's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon HD 6650M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K1000M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6650M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.