Quadro K1000M vs Radeon M535DX

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K1000M vs Radeon M535DX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K1000M vs Radeon M535DX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K1000M

2013

Why buy it

✅33.5% more average FPS across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Radeon M535DX

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Quadro K1000M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon M535DX is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K1000M across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K1000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 33.5% in average FPS across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (756 vs 750), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon M535DX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon M535DX makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro K1000M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro K1000M vs Radeon M535DX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K1000M

The Quadro K1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 756 points.

Radeon M535DX

The Radeon M535DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 750 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K1000M scores 756 and the Radeon M535DX reaches 750 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K1000M is built on Kepler while the Radeon M535DX uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K1000M) vs 512 (Radeon M535DX). Raw compute: 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K1000M) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon M535DX).

Feature	Quadro K1000M	Radeon M535DX
G3D Mark Score	756	750
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1536+200%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.369 TFLOPS+90%	1.247 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	128+300%	32
L1 Cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K1000M	Radeon M535DX
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K1000M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon M535DX carries 512 MB. Quadro K1000M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K1000M and 64-bit on the Radeon M535DX.

Feature	Quadro K1000M	Radeon M535DX
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K1000M draws 100W versus the Radeon M535DX's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon M535DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K1000M) vs 350W (Radeon M535DX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro K1000M	Radeon M535DX
TDP	100W	50W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Perf/Watt	7.6	15.0+97%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon M535DX (2019 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro K1000M	Radeon M535DX
MSRP	—	$200
Codename	GK104	Lexa
Release	July 23 2013	March 27 2019
Ranking	#562	#772

Search Quadro K1000M on Amazon

Search Radeon M535DX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.