GeForce GT 730A vs Quadro K1000M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 730A

2014Core: 628 MHzBoost: 657 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K1000M

2013Core: 771 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 730A vs Quadro K1000M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 730A vs Quadro K1000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 730A vs Quadro K1000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 730A

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($75 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 55W instead of 100W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro K1000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K1000M

2013

Why buy it

  • 27.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
  • 81.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K1000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 27.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (756 vs 743), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 730A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 730A makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro K1000M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 730A vs Quadro K1000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 730A

The GeForce GT 730A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 743 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K1000M

The Quadro K1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 756 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 730A scores 743 and the Quadro K1000M reaches 756 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 730A is built on Kepler while the Quadro K1000M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 730A) vs 1,536 (Quadro K1000M). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 730A) vs 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K1000M).

FeatureGeForce GT 730AQuadro K1000M
G3D Mark Score
743
756+2%
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
1536+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.009 TFLOPS
2.369 TFLOPS+135%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
64
128+100%
L1 Cache
64 KB
128 KB+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 730A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K1000M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 730AQuadro K1000M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 730A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K1000M carries 2 GB. Quadro K1000M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 730A and 64-bit on the Quadro K1000M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 730A) vs 512 KB (Quadro K1000M) — the Quadro K1000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 730AQuadro K1000M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 730A draws 55W versus the Quadro K1000M's 100W — a 58.1% difference. The GeForce GT 730A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 730A) vs 350W (Quadro K1000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 730AQuadro K1000M
TDP
55W-45%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
13.5+78%
7.6
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 730A (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 730AQuadro K1000M
MSRP
$75
Codename
GK106
GK104
Release
March 17 2014
July 23 2013
Ranking
#813
#562

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.