GeForce GT 340 vs GeForce GT 730A

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 340

2014Core: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 730A

2014Core: 628 MHzBoost: 657 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 340 vs GeForce GT 730A Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 340 vs GeForce GT 730A FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 340 vs GeForce GT 730A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 340

2014

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 730A across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 33.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$75 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.4 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
  • 16.4% higher power demand at 64W vs 55W.

GeForce GT 730A

2014

Why buy it

  • 52.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $25 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 34.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 7.4 G3D/$ ($75 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Draws 55W instead of 64W, a 9W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 730A is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 52.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (743 vs 738), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 340 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 730A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $25 cheaper on MSRP at $75 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 34.2% (9.9 vs 7.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 730A is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 340 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 340 vs GeForce GT 730A Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 340

The GeForce GT 340 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 738 points. Launch price was $89.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 730A

The GeForce GT 730A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 743 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 340 scores 738 and the GeForce GT 730A reaches 743 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 340 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 730A uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 340) vs 768 (GeForce GT 730A). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 340) vs 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 730A).

FeatureGeForce GT 340GeForce GT 730A
G3D Mark Score
738
743
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
768+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7626 TFLOPS
1.009 TFLOPS+32%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
64+100%
L1 Cache
32 KB
64 KB+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 340GeForce GT 730A
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 340 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 730A carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 340 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 340 and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 730A.

FeatureGeForce GT 340GeForce GT 730A
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 340) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 730A). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.1. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 340GeForce GT 730A
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
12 (11_0)+8%
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
OpenGL
3.3
4.5+36%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 340) vs No NVENC (GeForce GT 730A). Decoder: VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 340) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 730A).

FeatureGeForce GT 340GeForce GT 730A
Encoder
None
No NVENC
Decoder
VP4
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 340 draws 64W versus the GeForce GT 730A's 55W — a 15.1% difference. The GeForce GT 730A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 340) vs 350W (GeForce GT 730A). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 340GeForce GT 730A
TDP
64W
55W-14%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75
70°C-7%
Perf/Watt
11.5
13.5+17%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 340 came in at $100, while the GeForce GT 730A launched at $75. On MSRP, GeForce GT 730A was 25% cheaper ($25 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.4 (GeForce GT 340) vs 9.9 (GeForce GT 730A) — the GeForce GT 730A offers 33.8% better value.

FeatureGeForce GT 340GeForce GT 730A
MSRP
$100
$75-25%
Performance per Dollar
7.4
9.9+34%
Codename
GK107
GK106
Release
May 29 2014
March 17 2014
Ranking
#777
#813

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.